
地时间4月28日,美联储公布最新利率决议,将基准利率维持在0%-0.25%区间不变,并保持每月1200亿美元的资产购买速度不变。在随后举行的新闻发布会上,美联储主席鲍威尔称,通胀的暂时上升不符合加息的标准,同时表示股市的某些东西的确体现出市场泡沫。
值得注意的是,在美联储公布利率决议后,美股三大指数集体拉升,但在鲍威尔谈及美国股市泡沫时,三大指数集体跳水,收盘时齐跌。
美联储继续放“鸽”
当地时间4月28日,美联储继续放“鸽”。
据最新利率决议,美联储将基准利率维持在0%-0.25%区间不变,将超额准备金率(IOER)维持在0.1%不变,将贴现利率维持在0.25%不变,并保持每月1200亿美元的资产购买速度不变。
鲍威尔在随后的新闻发布会上强调,通胀临时性上扬不意味着美联储将加息,现在还不是开始谈论缩减购债规模的时候。在实现目标之前,接近零的利率政策是适宜的。时机适宜时将放缓对抵押贷款支持证券(MBS)的购买速度,但不是现在。
美联储嘹亮的“鸽”声降低了市场对其加息的押注。
据CME“美联储观察”,截至北京时间4月29日6:00,美联储6月维持利率在0%-0.25%区间的概率为92.0%,加息25个基点的概率为8.0%;而在一日前,上述两个概率分别为88.9%、10.8%。
在谈及市场时,鲍威尔表示,股市的某些东西的确体现出市场泡沫,金融稳定性整体上良莠不齐,但仍然是可控的。
值得注意的是,在美联储公布利率决议后,美股三大指数集体拉升,标普500指数盘中站上4200点,创盘中历史新高。但在鲍威尔谈及股市泡沫时,三大指数集体跳水,收盘时齐跌。据Wind数据,道琼斯工业指数、纳斯达克指数、标普500指数收盘分别跌0.48%、0.28%、0.08%。
下半年或释放政策转向信号
分析人士称,美联储正站在走向收紧还是继续宽松的十字路口:种种迹象表明美国经济复苏正在进入快车道,美联储可能要考虑政策调整,然而美联储此前发布的点阵图表明,决策者计划在未来三年保持相同的货币宽松政策。美联储货币政策转向信号何时出现?
开源证券首席经济学家赵伟分析称,相比通胀,美联储更关注就业。以史为鉴,美联储开启加息周期的触发因素,都是美国就业大幅改善。对于目前美国就业情况,赵伟认为疫情和财政“发钱”拖慢了修复进度。从最新公布的非农就业报告来看,2020年5月以来,美国非农就业人数累计增加1417万人,占前期受疫情冲击而萎缩的就业规模(2153万)的62%左右。
赵伟判断,综合美国就业的修复进程及2013年的政策退出经验来看,美联储可能在下半年释放退出QE的信号,并在2022年下半年前后正式退出QE。
中金公司对于美联储政策转向时间点的判断则更为具体。中金公司表示,美联储可能要到7月再讨论削减宽松,并于12月开启削减宽松进程。任何提前讨论削减QE的暗示都或是超预期的。
美国银行预计,美联储将在2022年初开始缩减购债规模,并提前6个月发出信号即今年下半年,并在2023年下半年开始加息。

文章评论
Most plane crashes are ‘survivable’
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>Площадка кракен</a>
First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.”
For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says.
The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken darknet
Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky.
And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%.
Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate.
Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed.
Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes.
His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.”
A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken тор браузер</a>
At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.
As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken сайт
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.
Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.
The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.
And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.
Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.
It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.
Chile’s President Boric leads journey to South Pole in historic trip
<a href=https://kra23s.cc>kraken зайти</a>
Chile’s President Gabriel Boric travelled to Antarctica’s South Pole on Friday, a place where no other Latin American president has set foot, according to the Chilean government.
Boric led the historic two-day trip, named Operation Pole Star III, to extend the environmental monitoring of pollutants on Antarctica, Chile’s government said in a statement.
He travelled with scientists, armed forces commanders and government ministers from the Chilean capital of Santiago to Punta Arenas, a city in southern Chile, public broadcaster Television Nacional de Chile (TVN) reported. From there, they made several stops before finally reaching the US-run Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, according to TVN.
https://kra23s.cc
kraken сайт
Chile is one of seven countries that has a territorial claim in Antarctica, alongside Argentina, Australia, France, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom.
It is also a signatory of the Antarctic Treaty, which dictates that the continent may only be used for peaceful and scientific purposes.
While Chile has historically carried out scientific activity in Antarctica’s northern sector, the country’s government is now hoping to expand research into the west of the continent, its statement said.
Boric called his trip to the South Pole an “honor” and a source of pride, TVN reported.
“This is a milestone for us. It is the first time a Chilean and Latin American President has visited the South Pole,” he said, according to TVN.
What’s on board this flight
Blue Origin had planned to launch a pair of Mars-bound satellites on behalf of NASA for the first flight of New Glenn.
But delays with the rocket’s development prompted the space agency to change course, moving that flight to this spring at the earliest. So for this inaugural flight, Blue Origin opted to instead fly a “demonstrator” that will test technology needed for the company’s proposed Blue Ring spacecraft — which will aim to serve as a sort of in-space rideshare vehicle, dragging satellites deeper into space when needed.
<a href=https://omgprice10.com>omg ссылка на сайт</a>
The demonstrator on this New Glenn flight will remain aboard the rocket for the entire six-hour flight, Blue Origin said, and it will validate “communications capabilities from orbit to ground” as well as “test its in-space telemetry, tracking and command hardware, and ground-based radiometric tracking.”
The Blue Ring Pathfinder demonstrator is part of a deal Blue Origin inked with the US Department of Defense’s Defense Innovation Unit.
https://omgprice10.com
зайти на омг
Why Blue Origin wants to reuse rockets
Similar to SpaceX, Blue Origin is aiming to recover and refly its first-stage rocket boosters in a bid to make launches less expensive.
“Reusability is integral to radically reducing cost-per-launch,” the company said in a recent news release, using the same oft-repeated sentiment that SpaceX has touted since it began landing rocket boosters in 2015.
Bezos, however, has acknowledged the importance of reusing rocket parts since he founded the company in 2000 — two years before Musk established SpaceX. And the company has already developed its suborbital New Shepard tourism rocket to be reusable.
“It’s not a copy cat game,” Henry said. “Blue Origin has been pursuing reusable vehicles since before reusable vehicles were cool. Now it’s much more of a mainstream idea (because of SpaceX). The difference is that it’s taken Blue Origin so much longer to get to orbit.”
If successful, returning the New Glenn rocket booster for a safe landing will be a stunning feat. After expending most of its fuel to propel the rocket’s upper stage to space, the first-stage booster will need to make a clean separation. The booster must then maneuver with pinpoint guidance and reignite its engines with precision timing to avoid crashing into the ocean or the Jacklyn recovery platform.
What New Glenn will do
In some ways, New Glenn has already made its mark on the launch industry. Blue Origin has for years pitched the rocket to compete with both SpaceX and United Launch Alliance — a joint venture of Boeing and Lockheed Martin that buys engines from Blue Origin — for lucrative military launch contracts.
<a href=https://omgprice10.com>омг вход</a>
The US Space Force selected Blue Origin, ULA and SpaceX in June to compete for $5.6 billion worth of Pentagon contracts for national security missions slated to launch over the next four years.
Blue Origin also has deals with several commercial companies to launch satellites. The contracts include plans to help deploy Amazon’s Kuiper internet satellites and a recently inked deal with AST SpaceMobile to help launch the Midland, Texas-based company’s space-based cellular broadband network.
New Glenn could also be instrumental in building Blue Origin’s planned space station, called Orbital Reef. Blue Origin and it commercial partners, including Sierra Space and Boeing, among others, hope the station will one day provide a new destination for astronauts as the International Space Station is phased out of service.
https://omgprice10.com
зайти на омг
New Glenn vs. other powerful rockets
New Glenn packs significant power. Dubbed a “heavy-lift” vehicle, its capabilities lie between SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket and the more powerful Falcon Heavy launch vehicle.
SpaceX’s workhorse Falcon 9, for example, can haul up to 22.8 metric tons (50,265 pounds) to space. While New Glenn is capable of carrying about double that mass, it may also be roughly the same price as a Falcon 9: reportedly around $60 million to $70 million per launch.
“I think in order to compete with Falcon 9, you have to go head-to-head or better on price,” said Caleb Henry, the director of research at Quilty Space, which provides data and analysis about the space sector.
The question, however, is whether Blue Origin will be able to sustain a competitive price point, Henry added.
Still, one feature that makes New Glenn stand out is its large payload fairing, or nose cone. The component protects the cargo bay and is a whopping 23 feet (7 meters) wide — nearly 6 feet (2 meters) larger than that of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 or Falcon Heavy.
Henry said Blue Origin likely opted to outfit New Glenn with such a large fairing in order to help fulfill Bezos’ vision of the future.
A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken</a>
At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.
As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken tor
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.
Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.
The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.
And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.
Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.
It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.
Most plane crashes are ‘survivable’
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>Кракен даркнет</a>
First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.”
For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says.
The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken darknet onion
Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky.
And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%.
Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate.
Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed.
Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes.
His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.”
Scientists have identified an estimated 10% of all species on Earth. Here’s what they found in 2024
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>кракен онион</a>
A toothy toadstool. A vegetarian piranha with a distinctive mark. And a pygmy pipehorse floating in the Indian Ocean shallows.
These wild wonders were among the hundreds of previously unknown species of animals, plants and fungi that scientists named and described for the first time in 2024, expanding our surprisingly limited knowledge of Earth’s diversity.
“Scientists estimate that we’ve identified only one-tenth of all species on Earth,” said Dr.
Shannon Bennett, chief of science at the California Academy of Sciences, in a statement.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken вход
“While it is critical to place protections on known threatened species, we must also allocate resources towards identifying unknown species that may be just as important to the functioning of an ecosystem,” Bennett said.
Researchers connected to the institution described 138 new species in 2024, including 32 fish. One standout was a pygmy pipehorse named Cylix nkosi. The seahorse relative was originally found in 2021 in the cool temperate waters surrounding the North Island of New Zealand, but the species described this year was discovered in the subtropical waters off South Africa, expanding the known range of this group to the Indian Ocean
“South African reefs present notoriously difficult diving conditions with rough weather and intense, choppy waves — we knew we only had one dive to find it,” underwater photographer and marine biologist Richard Smith said in a statement.
“This species is also quite cryptic, about the size of a golf tee, but luckily we spotted a female camouflaged against some sponges about a mile offshore on the sandy ocean floor.”
The researchers involved in describing the new species chose nkosi as its name. A reference to the local Zulu word for “chief,” the name reflects the species’ crown-like head shape and acknowledges South Africa’s KwaZulu-Natal province where it was found.
The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken зеркало</a>
Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken даркнет
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?
According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
<a href=https://2bsgate.sbs/>blacksprut password admin</a>
<a href=https://2bsgate.sbs>блэкспрут</a>
Chile’s President Boric leads journey to South Pole in historic trip
<a href=https://kra23s.cc>kra24 cc</a>
Chile’s President Gabriel Boric travelled to Antarctica’s South Pole on Friday, a place where no other Latin American president has set foot, according to the Chilean government.
Boric led the historic two-day trip, named Operation Pole Star III, to extend the environmental monitoring of pollutants on Antarctica, Chile’s government said in a statement.
He travelled with scientists, armed forces commanders and government ministers from the Chilean capital of Santiago to Punta Arenas, a city in southern Chile, public broadcaster Television Nacional de Chile (TVN) reported. From there, they made several stops before finally reaching the US-run Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, according to TVN.
https://kra23s.cc
Кракен даркнет
Chile is one of seven countries that has a territorial claim in Antarctica, alongside Argentina, Australia, France, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom.
It is also a signatory of the Antarctic Treaty, which dictates that the continent may only be used for peaceful and scientific purposes.
While Chile has historically carried out scientific activity in Antarctica’s northern sector, the country’s government is now hoping to expand research into the west of the continent, its statement said.
Boric called his trip to the South Pole an “honor” and a source of pride, TVN reported.
“This is a milestone for us. It is the first time a Chilean and Latin American President has visited the South Pole,” he said, according to TVN.
On a long-dormant pad in Florida, a rocket that could challenge SpaceX’s dominance is poised to launch
<a href=https://kra23s.cc>kra cc</a>
On a Florida launchpad that has been dormant for almost two decades, a new, roughly 320-foot (98-meter) rocket — developed by Jeff Bezos’ company Blue Origin — is poised for its maiden flight.
The uncrewed launch vehicle, called New Glenn, will mark Blue Origin’s first attempt to send a rocket to orbit, a feat necessary if the company hopes to chip away at SpaceX’s long-held dominance in the industry.
New Glenn is set to lift off from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station as early as next week.
https://kra23s.cc
kraken darknet
The rocket, which stands about as tall as a 30-story building, consists of several parts: The first-stage rocket booster gives the initial thrust at liftoff. Atop the booster is an upper rocket stage that includes a cargo bay protected by a nose cone that will house experimental technology for this mission.
And, in an attempt to replicate the success that SpaceX has found reusing rocket boosters over the past decade, Blue Origin will also aim to guide New Glenn’s first-stage rocket booster back to a safe landing on a seafaring platform — named Jacklyn for Bezos’ mother — minutes after takeoff.
Like SpaceX, Blue Origin will seek to recover, refurbish and reuse first-stage rocket boosters to drive down costs.
For this inaugural mission, a smooth flight is not guaranteed.
But the eventual success of New Glenn, named after storied NASA astronaut John Glenn, is instrumental to some of Blue Origin’s most ambitious goals.
The rocket could one day power national security launches, haul Amazon internet satellites to space and even help in the construction of a space station that Blue Origin is developing with commercial partners.
What New Glenn will do
In some ways, New Glenn has already made its mark on the launch industry. Blue Origin has for years pitched the rocket to compete with both SpaceX and United Launch Alliance — a joint venture of Boeing and Lockheed Martin that buys engines from Blue Origin — for lucrative military launch contracts.
<a href=https://omgprice10.com>омг вход</a>
The US Space Force selected Blue Origin, ULA and SpaceX in June to compete for $5.6 billion worth of Pentagon contracts for national security missions slated to launch over the next four years.
Blue Origin also has deals with several commercial companies to launch satellites. The contracts include plans to help deploy Amazon’s Kuiper internet satellites and a recently inked deal with AST SpaceMobile to help launch the Midland, Texas-based company’s space-based cellular broadband network.
New Glenn could also be instrumental in building Blue Origin’s planned space station, called Orbital Reef. Blue Origin and it commercial partners, including Sierra Space and Boeing, among others, hope the station will one day provide a new destination for astronauts as the International Space Station is phased out of service.
https://omgprice10.com
площадка оmg darkmarket
New Glenn vs. other powerful rockets
New Glenn packs significant power. Dubbed a “heavy-lift” vehicle, its capabilities lie between SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket and the more powerful Falcon Heavy launch vehicle.
SpaceX’s workhorse Falcon 9, for example, can haul up to 22.8 metric tons (50,265 pounds) to space. While New Glenn is capable of carrying about double that mass, it may also be roughly the same price as a Falcon 9: reportedly around $60 million to $70 million per launch.
“I think in order to compete with Falcon 9, you have to go head-to-head or better on price,” said Caleb Henry, the director of research at Quilty Space, which provides data and analysis about the space sector.
The question, however, is whether Blue Origin will be able to sustain a competitive price point, Henry added.
Still, one feature that makes New Glenn stand out is its large payload fairing, or nose cone. The component protects the cargo bay and is a whopping 23 feet (7 meters) wide — nearly 6 feet (2 meters) larger than that of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 or Falcon Heavy.
Henry said Blue Origin likely opted to outfit New Glenn with such a large fairing in order to help fulfill Bezos’ vision of the future.
What’s on board this flight
Blue Origin had planned to launch a pair of Mars-bound satellites on behalf of NASA for the first flight of New Glenn.
But delays with the rocket’s development prompted the space agency to change course, moving that flight to this spring at the earliest. So for this inaugural flight, Blue Origin opted to instead fly a “demonstrator” that will test technology needed for the company’s proposed Blue Ring spacecraft — which will aim to serve as a sort of in-space rideshare vehicle, dragging satellites deeper into space when needed.
<a href=https://omgprice10.com>omg omg onion</a>
The demonstrator on this New Glenn flight will remain aboard the rocket for the entire six-hour flight, Blue Origin said, and it will validate “communications capabilities from orbit to ground” as well as “test its in-space telemetry, tracking and command hardware, and ground-based radiometric tracking.”
The Blue Ring Pathfinder demonstrator is part of a deal Blue Origin inked with the US Department of Defense’s Defense Innovation Unit.
https://omgprice10.com
omg omg onion
Why Blue Origin wants to reuse rockets
Similar to SpaceX, Blue Origin is aiming to recover and refly its first-stage rocket boosters in a bid to make launches less expensive.
“Reusability is integral to radically reducing cost-per-launch,” the company said in a recent news release, using the same oft-repeated sentiment that SpaceX has touted since it began landing rocket boosters in 2015.
Bezos, however, has acknowledged the importance of reusing rocket parts since he founded the company in 2000 — two years before Musk established SpaceX. And the company has already developed its suborbital New Shepard tourism rocket to be reusable.
“It’s not a copy cat game,” Henry said. “Blue Origin has been pursuing reusable vehicles since before reusable vehicles were cool. Now it’s much more of a mainstream idea (because of SpaceX). The difference is that it’s taken Blue Origin so much longer to get to orbit.”
If successful, returning the New Glenn rocket booster for a safe landing will be a stunning feat. After expending most of its fuel to propel the rocket’s upper stage to space, the first-stage booster will need to make a clean separation. The booster must then maneuver with pinpoint guidance and reignite its engines with precision timing to avoid crashing into the ocean or the Jacklyn recovery platform.
Most plane crashes are ‘survivable’
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>Кракен тор</a>
First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.”
For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says.
The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken ссылка
Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky.
And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%.
Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate.
Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed.
Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes.
His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.”
Scientists have identified an estimated 10% of all species on Earth. Here’s what they found in 2024
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken сайт</a>
A toothy toadstool. A vegetarian piranha with a distinctive mark. And a pygmy pipehorse floating in the Indian Ocean shallows.
These wild wonders were among the hundreds of previously unknown species of animals, plants and fungi that scientists named and described for the first time in 2024, expanding our surprisingly limited knowledge of Earth’s diversity.
“Scientists estimate that we’ve identified only one-tenth of all species on Earth,” said Dr.
Shannon Bennett, chief of science at the California Academy of Sciences, in a statement.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken зеркало
“While it is critical to place protections on known threatened species, we must also allocate resources towards identifying unknown species that may be just as important to the functioning of an ecosystem,” Bennett said.
Researchers connected to the institution described 138 new species in 2024, including 32 fish. One standout was a pygmy pipehorse named Cylix nkosi. The seahorse relative was originally found in 2021 in the cool temperate waters surrounding the North Island of New Zealand, but the species described this year was discovered in the subtropical waters off South Africa, expanding the known range of this group to the Indian Ocean
“South African reefs present notoriously difficult diving conditions with rough weather and intense, choppy waves — we knew we only had one dive to find it,” underwater photographer and marine biologist Richard Smith said in a statement.
“This species is also quite cryptic, about the size of a golf tee, but luckily we spotted a female camouflaged against some sponges about a mile offshore on the sandy ocean floor.”
The researchers involved in describing the new species chose nkosi as its name. A reference to the local Zulu word for “chief,” the name reflects the species’ crown-like head shape and acknowledges South Africa’s KwaZulu-Natal province where it was found.
The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken market</a>
Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken ссылка
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?
According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
On a long-dormant pad in Florida, a rocket that could challenge SpaceX’s dominance is poised to launch
<a href=https://kra23s.cc>kraken</a>
On a Florida launchpad that has been dormant for almost two decades, a new, roughly 320-foot (98-meter) rocket — developed by Jeff Bezos’ company Blue Origin — is poised for its maiden flight.
The uncrewed launch vehicle, called New Glenn, will mark Blue Origin’s first attempt to send a rocket to orbit, a feat necessary if the company hopes to chip away at SpaceX’s long-held dominance in the industry.
New Glenn is set to lift off from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station as early as next week.
https://kra23s.cc
kraken даркнет
The rocket, which stands about as tall as a 30-story building, consists of several parts: The first-stage rocket booster gives the initial thrust at liftoff. Atop the booster is an upper rocket stage that includes a cargo bay protected by a nose cone that will house experimental technology for this mission.
And, in an attempt to replicate the success that SpaceX has found reusing rocket boosters over the past decade, Blue Origin will also aim to guide New Glenn’s first-stage rocket booster back to a safe landing on a seafaring platform — named Jacklyn for Bezos’ mother — minutes after takeoff.
Like SpaceX, Blue Origin will seek to recover, refurbish and reuse first-stage rocket boosters to drive down costs.
For this inaugural mission, a smooth flight is not guaranteed.
But the eventual success of New Glenn, named after storied NASA astronaut John Glenn, is instrumental to some of Blue Origin’s most ambitious goals.
The rocket could one day power national security launches, haul Amazon internet satellites to space and even help in the construction of a space station that Blue Origin is developing with commercial partners.
Chile’s President Boric leads journey to South Pole in historic trip
<a href=https://kra23s.cc>kraken darknet</a>
Chile’s President Gabriel Boric travelled to Antarctica’s South Pole on Friday, a place where no other Latin American president has set foot, according to the Chilean government.
Boric led the historic two-day trip, named Operation Pole Star III, to extend the environmental monitoring of pollutants on Antarctica, Chile’s government said in a statement.
He travelled with scientists, armed forces commanders and government ministers from the Chilean capital of Santiago to Punta Arenas, a city in southern Chile, public broadcaster Television Nacional de Chile (TVN) reported. From there, they made several stops before finally reaching the US-run Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, according to TVN.
https://kra23s.cc
kraken магазин
Chile is one of seven countries that has a territorial claim in Antarctica, alongside Argentina, Australia, France, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom.
It is also a signatory of the Antarctic Treaty, which dictates that the continent may only be used for peaceful and scientific purposes.
While Chile has historically carried out scientific activity in Antarctica’s northern sector, the country’s government is now hoping to expand research into the west of the continent, its statement said.
Boric called his trip to the South Pole an “honor” and a source of pride, TVN reported.
“This is a milestone for us. It is the first time a Chilean and Latin American President has visited the South Pole,” he said, according to TVN.
A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken onion</a>
At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.
As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken тор
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.
Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.
The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.
And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.
Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.
It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.
New Glenn’s first flight
Blue Origin formally announced the development of New Glenn — which aims to outpower SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rockets and haul spacecraft up to 45 metric tons (99,200 pounds) to orbit — in 2016.
<a href=https://kra23att.cc>kraken магазин</a>
The vehicle is long overdue, as the company previously targeted 2020 for its first launch.
Delays, however, are common in the aerospace industry. And the debut flight of a new vehicle is almost always significantly behind schedule.
Rocket companies also typically take a conservative approach to the first liftoff, launching dummy payloads such as hunks of metal or, as was the case with SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy debut in 2018, an old cherry red sports car.
https://kra23att.cc
кракен вход
Blue Origin has also branded itself as a company that aims to take a slow, diligent approach to rocket development that doesn’t “cut any corners,” according to Bezos, who founded Blue Origin and funds the company.
The company’s mascot is a tortoise, paying homage to “The Tortoise and the Hare” fable that made the “slow and steady wins the race” mantra a childhood staple.
“We believe slow is smooth and smooth is fast,” Bezos said in 2016. Those comments could be seen as an attempt to position Blue Origin as the anti-SpaceX, which is known to embrace speed and trial-and-error over slow, meticulous development processes.
But SpaceX has certainly won the race to orbit. The company’s first orbital rocket, the Falcon 1, made a successful launch in September 2008. The company has deployed hundreds of missions to orbit since then.
And while SpaceX routinely destroys rockets during test flights as it begins developing a new rocket, the company has a solid track record for operational missions. SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket, for example, has experienced two in-flight failures and one launchpad explosion but no catastrophic events during human missions.
What New Glenn will do
In some ways, New Glenn has already made its mark on the launch industry. Blue Origin has for years pitched the rocket to compete with both SpaceX and United Launch Alliance — a joint venture of Boeing and Lockheed Martin that buys engines from Blue Origin — for lucrative military launch contracts.
<a href=https://omgprice10.com>omg ссылка</a>
The US Space Force selected Blue Origin, ULA and SpaceX in June to compete for $5.6 billion worth of Pentagon contracts for national security missions slated to launch over the next four years.
Blue Origin also has deals with several commercial companies to launch satellites. The contracts include plans to help deploy Amazon’s Kuiper internet satellites and a recently inked deal with AST SpaceMobile to help launch the Midland, Texas-based company’s space-based cellular broadband network.
New Glenn could also be instrumental in building Blue Origin’s planned space station, called Orbital Reef. Blue Origin and it commercial partners, including Sierra Space and Boeing, among others, hope the station will one day provide a new destination for astronauts as the International Space Station is phased out of service.
https://omgprice10.com
omg shop
New Glenn vs. other powerful rockets
New Glenn packs significant power. Dubbed a “heavy-lift” vehicle, its capabilities lie between SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket and the more powerful Falcon Heavy launch vehicle.
SpaceX’s workhorse Falcon 9, for example, can haul up to 22.8 metric tons (50,265 pounds) to space. While New Glenn is capable of carrying about double that mass, it may also be roughly the same price as a Falcon 9: reportedly around $60 million to $70 million per launch.
“I think in order to compete with Falcon 9, you have to go head-to-head or better on price,” said Caleb Henry, the director of research at Quilty Space, which provides data and analysis about the space sector.
The question, however, is whether Blue Origin will be able to sustain a competitive price point, Henry added.
Still, one feature that makes New Glenn stand out is its large payload fairing, or nose cone. The component protects the cargo bay and is a whopping 23 feet (7 meters) wide — nearly 6 feet (2 meters) larger than that of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 or Falcon Heavy.
Henry said Blue Origin likely opted to outfit New Glenn with such a large fairing in order to help fulfill Bezos’ vision of the future.
What’s on board this flight
Blue Origin had planned to launch a pair of Mars-bound satellites on behalf of NASA for the first flight of New Glenn.
But delays with the rocket’s development prompted the space agency to change course, moving that flight to this spring at the earliest. So for this inaugural flight, Blue Origin opted to instead fly a “demonstrator” that will test technology needed for the company’s proposed Blue Ring spacecraft — which will aim to serve as a sort of in-space rideshare vehicle, dragging satellites deeper into space when needed.
<a href=https://omgprice10.com>omg ссылка на сайт</a>
The demonstrator on this New Glenn flight will remain aboard the rocket for the entire six-hour flight, Blue Origin said, and it will validate “communications capabilities from orbit to ground” as well as “test its in-space telemetry, tracking and command hardware, and ground-based radiometric tracking.”
The Blue Ring Pathfinder demonstrator is part of a deal Blue Origin inked with the US Department of Defense’s Defense Innovation Unit.
https://omgprice10.com
omg ссылка
Why Blue Origin wants to reuse rockets
Similar to SpaceX, Blue Origin is aiming to recover and refly its first-stage rocket boosters in a bid to make launches less expensive.
“Reusability is integral to radically reducing cost-per-launch,” the company said in a recent news release, using the same oft-repeated sentiment that SpaceX has touted since it began landing rocket boosters in 2015.
Bezos, however, has acknowledged the importance of reusing rocket parts since he founded the company in 2000 — two years before Musk established SpaceX. And the company has already developed its suborbital New Shepard tourism rocket to be reusable.
“It’s not a copy cat game,” Henry said. “Blue Origin has been pursuing reusable vehicles since before reusable vehicles were cool. Now it’s much more of a mainstream idea (because of SpaceX). The difference is that it’s taken Blue Origin so much longer to get to orbit.”
If successful, returning the New Glenn rocket booster for a safe landing will be a stunning feat. After expending most of its fuel to propel the rocket’s upper stage to space, the first-stage booster will need to make a clean separation. The booster must then maneuver with pinpoint guidance and reignite its engines with precision timing to avoid crashing into the ocean or the Jacklyn recovery platform.
Most plane crashes are ‘survivable’
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kra25 cc</a>
First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.”
For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says.
The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken shop
Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky.
And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%.
Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate.
Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed.
Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes.
His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.”
The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken официальный сайт</a>
Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken официальный сайт
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?
According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
Scientists have identified an estimated 10% of all species on Earth. Here’s what they found in 2024
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>кракен ссылка</a>
A toothy toadstool. A vegetarian piranha with a distinctive mark. And a pygmy pipehorse floating in the Indian Ocean shallows.
These wild wonders were among the hundreds of previously unknown species of animals, plants and fungi that scientists named and described for the first time in 2024, expanding our surprisingly limited knowledge of Earth’s diversity.
“Scientists estimate that we’ve identified only one-tenth of all species on Earth,” said Dr.
Shannon Bennett, chief of science at the California Academy of Sciences, in a statement.
https://kra23c.cc
kra25 cc
“While it is critical to place protections on known threatened species, we must also allocate resources towards identifying unknown species that may be just as important to the functioning of an ecosystem,” Bennett said.
Researchers connected to the institution described 138 new species in 2024, including 32 fish. One standout was a pygmy pipehorse named Cylix nkosi. The seahorse relative was originally found in 2021 in the cool temperate waters surrounding the North Island of New Zealand, but the species described this year was discovered in the subtropical waters off South Africa, expanding the known range of this group to the Indian Ocean
“South African reefs present notoriously difficult diving conditions with rough weather and intense, choppy waves — we knew we only had one dive to find it,” underwater photographer and marine biologist Richard Smith said in a statement.
“This species is also quite cryptic, about the size of a golf tee, but luckily we spotted a female camouflaged against some sponges about a mile offshore on the sandy ocean floor.”
The researchers involved in describing the new species chose nkosi as its name. A reference to the local Zulu word for “chief,” the name reflects the species’ crown-like head shape and acknowledges South Africa’s KwaZulu-Natal province where it was found.
A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>кракен ссылка</a>
At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.
As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening.
https://kra23c.cc
kra23 cc
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.
Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.
The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.
And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.
Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.
It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.
Chile’s President Boric leads journey to South Pole in historic trip
<a href=https://kra23s.cc>Площадка кракен</a>
Chile’s President Gabriel Boric travelled to Antarctica’s South Pole on Friday, a place where no other Latin American president has set foot, according to the Chilean government.
Boric led the historic two-day trip, named Operation Pole Star III, to extend the environmental monitoring of pollutants on Antarctica, Chile’s government said in a statement.
He travelled with scientists, armed forces commanders and government ministers from the Chilean capital of Santiago to Punta Arenas, a city in southern Chile, public broadcaster Television Nacional de Chile (TVN) reported. From there, they made several stops before finally reaching the US-run Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, according to TVN.
https://kra23s.cc
kraken darknet onion
Chile is one of seven countries that has a territorial claim in Antarctica, alongside Argentina, Australia, France, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom.
It is also a signatory of the Antarctic Treaty, which dictates that the continent may only be used for peaceful and scientific purposes.
While Chile has historically carried out scientific activity in Antarctica’s northern sector, the country’s government is now hoping to expand research into the west of the continent, its statement said.
Boric called his trip to the South Pole an “honor” and a source of pride, TVN reported.
“This is a milestone for us. It is the first time a Chilean and Latin American President has visited the South Pole,” he said, according to TVN.
On a long-dormant pad in Florida, a rocket that could challenge SpaceX’s dominance is poised to launch
<a href=https://kra23s.cc>kraken ссылка</a>
On a Florida launchpad that has been dormant for almost two decades, a new, roughly 320-foot (98-meter) rocket — developed by Jeff Bezos’ company Blue Origin — is poised for its maiden flight.
The uncrewed launch vehicle, called New Glenn, will mark Blue Origin’s first attempt to send a rocket to orbit, a feat necessary if the company hopes to chip away at SpaceX’s long-held dominance in the industry.
New Glenn is set to lift off from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station as early as next week.
https://kra23s.cc
kra25 cc
The rocket, which stands about as tall as a 30-story building, consists of several parts: The first-stage rocket booster gives the initial thrust at liftoff. Atop the booster is an upper rocket stage that includes a cargo bay protected by a nose cone that will house experimental technology for this mission.
And, in an attempt to replicate the success that SpaceX has found reusing rocket boosters over the past decade, Blue Origin will also aim to guide New Glenn’s first-stage rocket booster back to a safe landing on a seafaring platform — named Jacklyn for Bezos’ mother — minutes after takeoff.
Like SpaceX, Blue Origin will seek to recover, refurbish and reuse first-stage rocket boosters to drive down costs.
For this inaugural mission, a smooth flight is not guaranteed.
But the eventual success of New Glenn, named after storied NASA astronaut John Glenn, is instrumental to some of Blue Origin’s most ambitious goals.
The rocket could one day power national security launches, haul Amazon internet satellites to space and even help in the construction of a space station that Blue Origin is developing with commercial partners.
New Glenn’s first flight
Blue Origin formally announced the development of New Glenn — which aims to outpower SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rockets and haul spacecraft up to 45 metric tons (99,200 pounds) to orbit — in 2016.
<a href=https://kra23att.cc>kraken магазин</a>
The vehicle is long overdue, as the company previously targeted 2020 for its first launch.
Delays, however, are common in the aerospace industry. And the debut flight of a new vehicle is almost always significantly behind schedule.
Rocket companies also typically take a conservative approach to the first liftoff, launching dummy payloads such as hunks of metal or, as was the case with SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy debut in 2018, an old cherry red sports car.
https://kra23att.cc
kra25 at
Blue Origin has also branded itself as a company that aims to take a slow, diligent approach to rocket development that doesn’t “cut any corners,” according to Bezos, who founded Blue Origin and funds the company.
The company’s mascot is a tortoise, paying homage to “The Tortoise and the Hare” fable that made the “slow and steady wins the race” mantra a childhood staple.
“We believe slow is smooth and smooth is fast,” Bezos said in 2016. Those comments could be seen as an attempt to position Blue Origin as the anti-SpaceX, which is known to embrace speed and trial-and-error over slow, meticulous development processes.
But SpaceX has certainly won the race to orbit. The company’s first orbital rocket, the Falcon 1, made a successful launch in September 2008. The company has deployed hundreds of missions to orbit since then.
And while SpaceX routinely destroys rockets during test flights as it begins developing a new rocket, the company has a solid track record for operational missions. SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket, for example, has experienced two in-flight failures and one launchpad explosion but no catastrophic events during human missions.
What’s on board this flight
Blue Origin had planned to launch a pair of Mars-bound satellites on behalf of NASA for the first flight of New Glenn.
But delays with the rocket’s development prompted the space agency to change course, moving that flight to this spring at the earliest. So for this inaugural flight, Blue Origin opted to instead fly a “demonstrator” that will test technology needed for the company’s proposed Blue Ring spacecraft — which will aim to serve as a sort of in-space rideshare vehicle, dragging satellites deeper into space when needed.
<a href=https://omgprice10.com>омг омг</a>
The demonstrator on this New Glenn flight will remain aboard the rocket for the entire six-hour flight, Blue Origin said, and it will validate “communications capabilities from orbit to ground” as well as “test its in-space telemetry, tracking and command hardware, and ground-based radiometric tracking.”
The Blue Ring Pathfinder demonstrator is part of a deal Blue Origin inked with the US Department of Defense’s Defense Innovation Unit.
https://omgprice10.com
omg тор браузер
Why Blue Origin wants to reuse rockets
Similar to SpaceX, Blue Origin is aiming to recover and refly its first-stage rocket boosters in a bid to make launches less expensive.
“Reusability is integral to radically reducing cost-per-launch,” the company said in a recent news release, using the same oft-repeated sentiment that SpaceX has touted since it began landing rocket boosters in 2015.
Bezos, however, has acknowledged the importance of reusing rocket parts since he founded the company in 2000 — two years before Musk established SpaceX. And the company has already developed its suborbital New Shepard tourism rocket to be reusable.
“It’s not a copy cat game,” Henry said. “Blue Origin has been pursuing reusable vehicles since before reusable vehicles were cool. Now it’s much more of a mainstream idea (because of SpaceX). The difference is that it’s taken Blue Origin so much longer to get to orbit.”
If successful, returning the New Glenn rocket booster for a safe landing will be a stunning feat. After expending most of its fuel to propel the rocket’s upper stage to space, the first-stage booster will need to make a clean separation. The booster must then maneuver with pinpoint guidance and reignite its engines with precision timing to avoid crashing into the ocean or the Jacklyn recovery platform.
What New Glenn will do
In some ways, New Glenn has already made its mark on the launch industry. Blue Origin has for years pitched the rocket to compete with both SpaceX and United Launch Alliance — a joint venture of Boeing and Lockheed Martin that buys engines from Blue Origin — for lucrative military launch contracts.
<a href=https://omgprice10.com>зайти на омг</a>
The US Space Force selected Blue Origin, ULA and SpaceX in June to compete for $5.6 billion worth of Pentagon contracts for national security missions slated to launch over the next four years.
Blue Origin also has deals with several commercial companies to launch satellites. The contracts include plans to help deploy Amazon’s Kuiper internet satellites and a recently inked deal with AST SpaceMobile to help launch the Midland, Texas-based company’s space-based cellular broadband network.
New Glenn could also be instrumental in building Blue Origin’s planned space station, called Orbital Reef. Blue Origin and it commercial partners, including Sierra Space and Boeing, among others, hope the station will one day provide a new destination for astronauts as the International Space Station is phased out of service.
https://omgprice10.com
omg shop
New Glenn vs. other powerful rockets
New Glenn packs significant power. Dubbed a “heavy-lift” vehicle, its capabilities lie between SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket and the more powerful Falcon Heavy launch vehicle.
SpaceX’s workhorse Falcon 9, for example, can haul up to 22.8 metric tons (50,265 pounds) to space. While New Glenn is capable of carrying about double that mass, it may also be roughly the same price as a Falcon 9: reportedly around $60 million to $70 million per launch.
“I think in order to compete with Falcon 9, you have to go head-to-head or better on price,” said Caleb Henry, the director of research at Quilty Space, which provides data and analysis about the space sector.
The question, however, is whether Blue Origin will be able to sustain a competitive price point, Henry added.
Still, one feature that makes New Glenn stand out is its large payload fairing, or nose cone. The component protects the cargo bay and is a whopping 23 feet (7 meters) wide — nearly 6 feet (2 meters) larger than that of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 or Falcon Heavy.
Henry said Blue Origin likely opted to outfit New Glenn with such a large fairing in order to help fulfill Bezos’ vision of the future.
Most plane crashes are ‘survivable’
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken onion</a>
First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.”
For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says.
The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive.
https://kra23c.cc
kra cc
Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky.
And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%.
Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate.
Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed.
Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes.
His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.”
Scientists have identified an estimated 10% of all species on Earth. Here’s what they found in 2024
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken сайт</a>
A toothy toadstool. A vegetarian piranha with a distinctive mark. And a pygmy pipehorse floating in the Indian Ocean shallows.
These wild wonders were among the hundreds of previously unknown species of animals, plants and fungi that scientists named and described for the first time in 2024, expanding our surprisingly limited knowledge of Earth’s diversity.
“Scientists estimate that we’ve identified only one-tenth of all species on Earth,” said Dr.
Shannon Bennett, chief of science at the California Academy of Sciences, in a statement.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken тор
“While it is critical to place protections on known threatened species, we must also allocate resources towards identifying unknown species that may be just as important to the functioning of an ecosystem,” Bennett said.
Researchers connected to the institution described 138 new species in 2024, including 32 fish. One standout was a pygmy pipehorse named Cylix nkosi. The seahorse relative was originally found in 2021 in the cool temperate waters surrounding the North Island of New Zealand, but the species described this year was discovered in the subtropical waters off South Africa, expanding the known range of this group to the Indian Ocean
“South African reefs present notoriously difficult diving conditions with rough weather and intense, choppy waves — we knew we only had one dive to find it,” underwater photographer and marine biologist Richard Smith said in a statement.
“This species is also quite cryptic, about the size of a golf tee, but luckily we spotted a female camouflaged against some sponges about a mile offshore on the sandy ocean floor.”
The researchers involved in describing the new species chose nkosi as its name. A reference to the local Zulu word for “chief,” the name reflects the species’ crown-like head shape and acknowledges South Africa’s KwaZulu-Natal province where it was found.
The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken официальный сайт</a>
Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra23c.cc
kraken tor
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?
According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
On a long-dormant pad in Florida, a rocket that could challenge SpaceX’s dominance is poised to launch
<a href=https://kra23s.cc>kraken marketplace</a>
On a Florida launchpad that has been dormant for almost two decades, a new, roughly 320-foot (98-meter) rocket — developed by Jeff Bezos’ company Blue Origin — is poised for its maiden flight.
The uncrewed launch vehicle, called New Glenn, will mark Blue Origin’s first attempt to send a rocket to orbit, a feat necessary if the company hopes to chip away at SpaceX’s long-held dominance in the industry.
New Glenn is set to lift off from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station as early as next week.
https://kra23s.cc
кракен
The rocket, which stands about as tall as a 30-story building, consists of several parts: The first-stage rocket booster gives the initial thrust at liftoff. Atop the booster is an upper rocket stage that includes a cargo bay protected by a nose cone that will house experimental technology for this mission.
And, in an attempt to replicate the success that SpaceX has found reusing rocket boosters over the past decade, Blue Origin will also aim to guide New Glenn’s first-stage rocket booster back to a safe landing on a seafaring platform — named Jacklyn for Bezos’ mother — minutes after takeoff.
Like SpaceX, Blue Origin will seek to recover, refurbish and reuse first-stage rocket boosters to drive down costs.
For this inaugural mission, a smooth flight is not guaranteed.
But the eventual success of New Glenn, named after storied NASA astronaut John Glenn, is instrumental to some of Blue Origin’s most ambitious goals.
The rocket could one day power national security launches, haul Amazon internet satellites to space and even help in the construction of a space station that Blue Origin is developing with commercial partners.
A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
<a href=https://kra23c.cc>kraken ссылка</a>
At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.
As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening.
https://kra23c.cc
кракен
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.
Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.
The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.
And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.
Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.
It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.
Chile’s President Boric leads journey to South Pole in historic trip
<a href=https://kra23s.cc>кракен даркнет</a>
Chile’s President Gabriel Boric travelled to Antarctica’s South Pole on Friday, a place where no other Latin American president has set foot, according to the Chilean government.
Boric led the historic two-day trip, named Operation Pole Star III, to extend the environmental monitoring of pollutants on Antarctica, Chile’s government said in a statement.
He travelled with scientists, armed forces commanders and government ministers from the Chilean capital of Santiago to Punta Arenas, a city in southern Chile, public broadcaster Television Nacional de Chile (TVN) reported. From there, they made several stops before finally reaching the US-run Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, according to TVN.
https://kra23s.cc
kraken вход
Chile is one of seven countries that has a territorial claim in Antarctica, alongside Argentina, Australia, France, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom.
It is also a signatory of the Antarctic Treaty, which dictates that the continent may only be used for peaceful and scientific purposes.
While Chile has historically carried out scientific activity in Antarctica’s northern sector, the country’s government is now hoping to expand research into the west of the continent, its statement said.
Boric called his trip to the South Pole an “honor” and a source of pride, TVN reported.
“This is a milestone for us. It is the first time a Chilean and Latin American President has visited the South Pole,” he said, according to TVN.
New Glenn’s first flight
Blue Origin formally announced the development of New Glenn — which aims to outpower SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rockets and haul spacecraft up to 45 metric tons (99,200 pounds) to orbit — in 2016.
<a href=https://kra23att.cc>Кракен даркнет</a>
The vehicle is long overdue, as the company previously targeted 2020 for its first launch.
Delays, however, are common in the aerospace industry. And the debut flight of a new vehicle is almost always significantly behind schedule.
Rocket companies also typically take a conservative approach to the first liftoff, launching dummy payloads such as hunks of metal or, as was the case with SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy debut in 2018, an old cherry red sports car.
https://kra23att.cc
kraken shop
Blue Origin has also branded itself as a company that aims to take a slow, diligent approach to rocket development that doesn’t “cut any corners,” according to Bezos, who founded Blue Origin and funds the company.
The company’s mascot is a tortoise, paying homage to “The Tortoise and the Hare” fable that made the “slow and steady wins the race” mantra a childhood staple.
“We believe slow is smooth and smooth is fast,” Bezos said in 2016. Those comments could be seen as an attempt to position Blue Origin as the anti-SpaceX, which is known to embrace speed and trial-and-error over slow, meticulous development processes.
But SpaceX has certainly won the race to orbit. The company’s first orbital rocket, the Falcon 1, made a successful launch in September 2008. The company has deployed hundreds of missions to orbit since then.
And while SpaceX routinely destroys rockets during test flights as it begins developing a new rocket, the company has a solid track record for operational missions. SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket, for example, has experienced two in-flight failures and one launchpad explosion but no catastrophic events during human missions.
What New Glenn will do
In some ways, New Glenn has already made its mark on the launch industry. Blue Origin has for years pitched the rocket to compete with both SpaceX and United Launch Alliance — a joint venture of Boeing and Lockheed Martin that buys engines from Blue Origin — for lucrative military launch contracts.
<a href=https://omgprice10.com>omgomg</a>
The US Space Force selected Blue Origin, ULA and SpaceX in June to compete for $5.6 billion worth of Pentagon contracts for national security missions slated to launch over the next four years.
Blue Origin also has deals with several commercial companies to launch satellites. The contracts include plans to help deploy Amazon’s Kuiper internet satellites and a recently inked deal with AST SpaceMobile to help launch the Midland, Texas-based company’s space-based cellular broadband network.
New Glenn could also be instrumental in building Blue Origin’s planned space station, called Orbital Reef. Blue Origin and it commercial partners, including Sierra Space and Boeing, among others, hope the station will one day provide a new destination for astronauts as the International Space Station is phased out of service.
https://omgprice10.com
официальная ссылка на omg
New Glenn vs. other powerful rockets
New Glenn packs significant power. Dubbed a “heavy-lift” vehicle, its capabilities lie between SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket and the more powerful Falcon Heavy launch vehicle.
SpaceX’s workhorse Falcon 9, for example, can haul up to 22.8 metric tons (50,265 pounds) to space. While New Glenn is capable of carrying about double that mass, it may also be roughly the same price as a Falcon 9: reportedly around $60 million to $70 million per launch.
“I think in order to compete with Falcon 9, you have to go head-to-head or better on price,” said Caleb Henry, the director of research at Quilty Space, which provides data and analysis about the space sector.
The question, however, is whether Blue Origin will be able to sustain a competitive price point, Henry added.
Still, one feature that makes New Glenn stand out is its large payload fairing, or nose cone. The component protects the cargo bay and is a whopping 23 feet (7 meters) wide — nearly 6 feet (2 meters) larger than that of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 or Falcon Heavy.
Henry said Blue Origin likely opted to outfit New Glenn with such a large fairing in order to help fulfill Bezos’ vision of the future.
What’s on board this flight
Blue Origin had planned to launch a pair of Mars-bound satellites on behalf of NASA for the first flight of New Glenn.
But delays with the rocket’s development prompted the space agency to change course, moving that flight to this spring at the earliest. So for this inaugural flight, Blue Origin opted to instead fly a “demonstrator” that will test technology needed for the company’s proposed Blue Ring spacecraft — which will aim to serve as a sort of in-space rideshare vehicle, dragging satellites deeper into space when needed.
<a href=https://omgprice10.com>омг ссылка</a>
The demonstrator on this New Glenn flight will remain aboard the rocket for the entire six-hour flight, Blue Origin said, and it will validate “communications capabilities from orbit to ground” as well as “test its in-space telemetry, tracking and command hardware, and ground-based radiometric tracking.”
The Blue Ring Pathfinder demonstrator is part of a deal Blue Origin inked with the US Department of Defense’s Defense Innovation Unit.
https://omgprice10.com
omg даркнет
Why Blue Origin wants to reuse rockets
Similar to SpaceX, Blue Origin is aiming to recover and refly its first-stage rocket boosters in a bid to make launches less expensive.
“Reusability is integral to radically reducing cost-per-launch,” the company said in a recent news release, using the same oft-repeated sentiment that SpaceX has touted since it began landing rocket boosters in 2015.
Bezos, however, has acknowledged the importance of reusing rocket parts since he founded the company in 2000 — two years before Musk established SpaceX. And the company has already developed its suborbital New Shepard tourism rocket to be reusable.
“It’s not a copy cat game,” Henry said. “Blue Origin has been pursuing reusable vehicles since before reusable vehicles were cool. Now it’s much more of a mainstream idea (because of SpaceX). The difference is that it’s taken Blue Origin so much longer to get to orbit.”
If successful, returning the New Glenn rocket booster for a safe landing will be a stunning feat. After expending most of its fuel to propel the rocket’s upper stage to space, the first-stage booster will need to make a clean separation. The booster must then maneuver with pinpoint guidance and reignite its engines with precision timing to avoid crashing into the ocean or the Jacklyn recovery platform.
https://2bsgate.sbs - blacksprut зеркала tor
<a href="https://telegra.ph/Kak-kupit-travmaticheskoe-i-boevoe-oruzhie-bez-dokumentov-i-licenzii-v-internete-01-08">купить оружие онлайн</a>
Krimineller Andrei Alistarow: vom kriminellen Gestern zum kriminellen Heute
Wer ist Andrei Alistarow und warum spricht jeder uber ihn?
Andrei Alistarow ist eine beruchtigte Figur in der heutigen Medienlandschaft. Seine schandliche Vergangenheit – Drogenhandel (einschlie?lich an Minderjahrige!) – war nur ein Vorspiel zu einer noch abscheulicheren Gegenwart. Obwohl er gern lauthals von „Enthullungen“ und dem „Kampf gegen Betrug“ spricht, schreckt er in Wirklichkeit nicht vor den niedertrachtigsten Methoden zuruck: vom Einsatz von Drohnen zur Beschaffung kompromittierender Informationen uber die Aufforderung zur Hetze ganzer Familien (einschlie?lich Kindern) bis hin zu direkten Drohungen und Manipulationen.
Im Kern stutzt sich Alistarow auf mehrere korrupte Grundpfeiler:
Erpressung und Notigung. Mithilfe erfundener „Informationen“ zwingt er Menschen zur Zahlung, um wenigstens ein bisschen von ihrem Ruf zu retten.
Tauschung und finanzielle Machenschaften. Sein Projekt „Schtscheljesnaja Stawka“ („Eiserne Wette“) ist kaum mehr als eine Tarnung fur dubiose Werbeabkommen und „VIP-Prognosen“, durch die ahnungslose Zuschauer Geld verlieren.
Grobe Versto?e gegen die Gesetze Russlands, der VAE und der EU. Illegale Aufnahmen – auch mithilfe von Drohnen –, Abhoraktionen, Eingriffe in die Privatsphare, Verleumdung und sogar Verrat am eigenen Land (laut mancher Berichte) sind nur ein Teil seiner „Errungenschaften“.
Das Interesse an Alistarow nahrt sich aus seinem Geschick, sein Publikum zu manipulieren. Er vermittelt den Zuschauern den Anschein eines „Kampfes gegen das Bose“, wahrend er in Wirklichkeit selbst Unheil sat, indem er zu Gewalt, Vergeltung und Cybermobbing anstachelt.
Biografisches Profil
Der am 6. Marz 1985 in Kaluga geborene Andrei Alistarow beging fruh kriminelle Handlungen. Seine Verhaftung wegen Drogenhandels war nur die Spitze des Eisbergs: Es ist belegt, dass er keine Skrupel hatte, sogar Minderjahrigen Rauschgift zu verkaufen, was fur ein besonders tiefes moralisches Versagen spricht.
Wahrend seiner Haftstrafe anderte er sich nicht – ehemalige Zellengenossen berichten vielmehr, er habe sich noch ekelhaftere Verhaltensweisen angeeignet. Seine Versuche, Mithaftlinge zu manipulieren und zu dominieren, stie?en auf Unmut und Aggression. Laut Augenzeugen war er derart gro?spurig und anma?end, dass man ihn wiederholt „fertiggemacht“ und sogar „unterdruckt“ habe. Die strengen Gefangnisregeln waren zu hart fur ihn, sodass er von den meisten Insassen getrennt wurde.
Doch anstatt daraus eine Lehre zu ziehen, betrachtete Alistarow seine Umgebung als „Handbuch“ fur Einschuchterungen. Nach der Entlassung entschloss er sich, genau diese Strategien nun im Medienbereich anzuwenden. Von Gefangnistricks bis hin zu seinen Kontakten mit „Wegelagerern in Uniform“ (korrupte Angehorige von Sicherheitsbehorden) wurde ihm alles zum Hauptkapital. Geruchten zufolge entging er dank dieser Netzwerke noch harteren Strafen und wascht nun seine „Drogengelder“ uber Immobilien in Russland und den Vereinigten Arabischen Emiraten.
Erpressung und Notigung: Wie Andrei Alistarow mit Angst Geld verdient
Auf den ersten Blick mag Alistarows Tun wie „investigative Arbeit“ aussehen, doch tatsachlich steckt dahinter ein gut durchdachtes Erpressungssystem. Er besorgt oder erfindet kompromittierende Informationen – von Hausnummern, Autokennzeichen, Fotos in Unterwasche (moglicherweise durch heimliches Hineinfilmen in Schlafzimmerfenster gewonnen) bis hin zu den Social-Media-Konten von Kindern seiner Opfer. Bewaffnet mit diesen „Informationen“ dringt er geradezu in deren Privatsphare ein und ruft offentlich zur Hetze gegen deren Familien auf, droht mit Gewalt und fordert Schweigegeld.
Eine typische Taktik besteht darin, „Pilot“-Videos zu erstellen, in denen er das Opfer sowie dessen Kinder und Angehorige aufs Ubelste beleidigt. Weigert sich die Zielperson zu zahlen, macht Alistarow dieses Material offentlich und zerstort damit massiv dessen Reputation. Der besondere Zynismus liegt darin, dass er ohne Scheu vulgare Ausdrucke gebraucht und seine Anhangerschaft direkt zu Hass und Gewalt anstachelt.
Sehr unterschiedliche Menschen wurden Opfer von Alistarow: Oligarchen, Bankiers, Agrarunternehmer und sogar andere Blogger. Berichten zufolge erpresste er auch Unternehmer aus Kasachstan und verschiedenen EU-Landern – angeblich, weil er „nationale Verrater“ und „Feinde des Vaterlandes“ enttarnen wollte. Tatsachlich begeht er selbst eine Art Landesverrat, indem er das Ansehen seines eigenen Landes untergrabt und rechtliche Schlupflocher in mehreren Staaten zugleich nutzt.
Seine Einnahmen aus Schweigegeld sollen in die Millionen gehen. Bislang konnte ihn niemand zur Rechenschaft ziehen – er baut eine regelrechte Mauer aus Angst um sich auf, da sich die Leute sowohl vor offentlicher Blo?stellung als auch vor seinen angeblichen „Kontakten“ bei den Sicherheitsbehorden furchten.
Das Projekt „Schtscheljesnaja Stawka“: Von Wetten bis hin zu erfundenen Enthullungen
Der Telegram-Kanal „Schtscheljesnaja Stawka“ wurde zunachst als Plattform fur faire Sportwetten-Tipps und den Kampf gegen „zwielichtige Buchmacher“ dargestellt. Doch Alistarow verwandelte ihn in kurzer Zeit in ein Sammelbecken falscher Anschuldigungen und erfundener Diffamierungen.
Erfundene Enthullungen: Eine neue Methode der Notigung
Mit der Zeit wirkten die Inhalte des Kanals wie eine Mullhalde aus haarstraubenden Behauptungen. Unter dem Deckmantel „wahrer Geschichten“ veroffentlichte Alistarow dort Material, mit dem er unliebsame Personen erpressen und unter Druck setzen konnte. Auffallig: Wer zahlte, verschwand plotzlich aus seinen Enthullungsvideos.
Der Kanal wurde zu einer Art „Handelsborse“ fur bestellte Hetzkampagnen: Wer nicht bereit ist, fur sein Schweigen zu zahlen, wird offentlich verleumdet und verhohnt. Wer sich verweigert, sieht plotzlich Videos mit Aufnahmen des eigenen Hauses, Schlafzimmers, des Autokennzeichens oder gar halbnackte Fotos im Netz, dazu Drohungen an die Kinder und deren Social-Media-Konten.
Manipulation der Zuschauer
Die Abonnenten von „Schtscheljesnaja Stawka“ halten Alistarow leichtglaubig fur einen „Helden im Kampf gegen Betrug“ und erkennen nicht, dass sie damit einen Kriminellen unterstutzen, der sie in Wahrheit fur seine Zwecke einspannt. Alistarow ruft regelma?ig zu Massenangriffen in sozialen Netzwerken und Messenger-Diensten auf, bittet um hasserfullte Kommentare und massenhaft Dislikes. Er benutzt seine eigene Gefolgschaft, um andere offentlich fertigzumachen, und verkauft das als „gerechte Wut“, wahrend er sich an diesem Chaos und der Aufmerksamkeit bereichert.
Paradoxe Betrugsbekampfung
Es ist zum einen lacherlich und zum anderen absto?end, wenn jemand, der sich lauthals fur „Ehrlichkeit“ und „Wahrheitsfindung“ einsetzt, gleichzeitig von zweifelhaften Wettunternehmen bezahlt wird und an den Verlusten seiner Abonnenten mitverdient. Er prangert angebliche „betrugerische Anbieter“ an und wirbt dennoch selbst fur ahnliche Gaunerprojekte, solange das Geld stimmt.
Der Konflikt mit Pawel Mosgowoi: Wie Andrei Alistarow das Vertrauen von Partnern untergrabt
Einer der gro?ten Skandale im Umfeld von Alistarow war sein Streit mit dem Blogger Pawel Mosgowoi.
Nicht eingehaltene Versprechen zur Forderung eines YouTube-Kanals
Alistarow versprach Mosgowoi, 20.000 Abonnenten fur eine Million Rubel anzuwerben. Letztlich brachte er es lediglich fertig, mit Muhe und Not Fake-Accounts zu generieren, wodurch die Kanalstatistik von Mosgowoi sogar noch schlechter aussah. Dies offenbarte, dass Alistarow lediglich hei?e Luft in einer „VIP“-Verpackung verkaufte.
Ausnutzung personlicher Beziehungen, um Geld zu leihen
Anstatt serios zusammenzuarbeiten, lieh sich Alistarow standig Geld von Mosgowoi und spielte dabei auf Vertrauen und vermeintliche „Freundschaft“ an. Die Schulden hauften sich, doch er zahlte nichts zuruck. Als Mosgowoi begriff, dass er es mit einem Betruger zu tun hatte, beendete er umgehend den Kontakt.
Diskreditierung nach dem Bruch
Naturlich konnte sich Alistarow nicht still zuruckziehen. Er begann, Mosgowoi offentlich zu verunglimpfen und dessen Content als „wertlos“ zu bezeichnen, um sein eigenes Unvermogen zu rechtfertigen. Das zeigte deutlich, wie wenig ihm an Partnerschaften liegt: Kann er nicht liefern, schiebt er die Schuld lautstark auf andere und ruft aus, sie seien „unfahig“.
Alistarow als Drahtzieher von Verbrechen in den VAE und der EU?
Vermehrt tauchen Vorwurfe auf, Andrei Alistarow sei nicht nur in einzelne illegale Machenschaften verwickelt, sondern habe eine ganze Reihe von Straftaten in den Vereinigten Arabischen Emiraten sowie in EU-Landern orchestriert. Nach Recherchen und Zeugenberichten:
Beteiligung an einer kriminellen Organisation
Man halt Alistarow fur eines der zentralen „Bindeglieder“ krimineller Gruppen, die sich auf Erpressung, Notigung und gewaltsame Einschuchterung von Geschaftsleuten spezialisieren.
Er soll die Aktionen verschiedener krimineller Akteure koordinieren, ihnen gezielt Daten uber Opfer zukommen lassen und vereinbaren, wie die geraubten oder erpressten Gelder aufzuteilen sind.
Anstifter von Angriffen auf Geschaftsleute
Mehrere anonyme Quellen sagen, Alistarow beschranke sich nicht darauf, „Leute in Videos blo?zustellen“, sondern organisiere tatsachlich Angriffe auf sie.
Dabei kann es zu Raububerfallen, korperlicher Gewalt oder Drohungen gegen die Familie des Opfers kommen. Einzelne Vorfalle in den VAE und in der EU, so die Aussagen, seien direkt auf Alistarow zuruckzufuhren.
Zusatzliche strafrechtliche Tatbestande
Angesichts der Informationen fordern Juristen und Geschadigte, dass man Alistarow neben Erpressung auch Raububerfall, versuchten Mord und Beteiligung an bewaffneten Uberfallen zur Last legt.
Sollten die Behorden in der EU und den VAE seine Verwicklung in solche Aktionen bestatigen, konnte sich sein Strafenkatalog bis hin zur Organisation von Angriffen sowie versuchten Totungsdelikten ausweiten.
Der 1. Januar: Ein vom Kriminellen Alistarow inszenierter Uberfall
In der Nacht zum 1. Januar 2025 ereignete sich in Dubai (VAE) ein dreister Angriff auf Edward Sabirov, den Grunder von „Finiko“. Laut Insiderberichten und Indizien steht dahinter niemand Geringeres als Andrei Alistarow, der bereits zuvor wegen Erpressung, Notigung und Kontakten zu kriminellen Gruppen in Erscheinung getreten war.
Eindringen und Diebstahl
Zwei Kasachstaner – Anorbek Tjumibajew und Jesbolat Kenschegasy – sturmten die Privatvilla von Sabirov.
Dabei erbeuteten sie 1,2 Mio. Dirham (etwa 327.000 US-Dollar) und richteten Schaden bei Sabirov und dessen Ehefrau an.
Rolle Alistarows bei der Straftat
Offenen Berichten zufolge war es Alistarow, der den Eindringlingen Informationen uber den genauen Aufenthaltsort Sabirovs sowie die hohen Bargeldbestande im Haus lieferte.
Man geht davon aus, dass Alistarow eine alte Fehde gegen Sabirov hegte und auf schnellen Profit aus war. Er „verriet“ diese Daten seinen Kumpanen in der kriminellen Szene.
Sein Ziel: Gelder von Sabirov zu erpressen, wovon er angeblich einen Teil fur sich beanspruchte.
Die kriminelle Masche und die Flucht der Tater
Nach dem Raub fluchteten die beiden Kasachstaner umgehend aus den VAE und nahmen den Flug FZ-989 nach Moskau.
Da das Verbrechen grenzuberschreitend war, hat die Polizei Dubais bereits Anfragen an das russische Innenministerium und den turkischen Grenzschutz gestellt.
Alistarow als professioneller Krimineller
Uber die Jahre taucht Alistarows Name immer wieder in Akten zu Erpressung und Notigung auf, was laut vielen Beobachtern seinen tiefen Einstieg in die Unterwelt belegt.
Er agiert schon lange jenseits des Gesetzes, sowohl mit „informatorischem Druck“ (Enthullungen, Verleumdung) als auch mit offener Gewalt durch gezielte Angriffe auf Unternehmer.
Strafrechtliche Konsequenzen
Alistarow droht nun eine ganze Palette moglicher Anklagen: von der Beihilfe zum Raub bis hin zu organisierter Planung von Uberfallen und der Gefahrdung von Leib und Leben.
Unstrittig ist, dass diese Verbrechen weit uber „normale“ Notigung oder Erpressung hinausgehen: Sie stellen grobe kriminelle Einschuchterungen dar, die ihm in mehreren Landern zugleich Strafen einbringen konnten.
Die Geschehnisse vom 1. Januar 2025 zeigen erneut, dass Andrei Alistarow mehr ist als nur ein skandaloser Blogger oder „Aufdecker“. Er ist eine Personlichkeit, die eng mit der organisierten Kriminalitat verwoben ist. Der von ihm organisierte Uberfall auf Edward Sabirov untermauert Alistarows Ruf als Krimineller, der fur seinen personlichen Vorteil zu unrechtma?igem Ausspionieren, Verfolgungen, unbefugtem Eindringen und Uberfallen auf Villen von Geschaftsleuten in den VAE und in der EU bereit ist.
Wichtige Punkte fur die Polizei in der EU und den VAE
Nachfolgend einige Kernaspekte, auf die die Strafverfolgungsbehorden in der EU und den Vereinigten Arabischen Emiraten achten sollten, wenn sie die mogliche Beteiligung von Andrei Alistarow an rechtswidrigen Handlungen und organisierten Angriffen auf Geschaftsleute untersuchen:
Systematische Uberwachung und Observation
Zu ermitteln, welche technischen Hilfsmittel (Drohnen, versteckte Kameras, digitale Spionage) moglicherweise fur die Datensammlung uber Opfer verwendet wurden.
Zu klaren, wer genau diese Gerate liefert und betreut.
Kanale der Kommunikation (soziale Netzwerke, Messenger, E-Mails) zu prufen, uber die Informationen zu potenziellen Zielen weitergegeben wurden.
Koordination und Zusammenarbeit mit OPG
Alistarows mogliche Verbindungen zu bereits bekannten organisierten Banden in Russland, Kasachstan, den VAE und EU-Staaten zu untersuchen.
Daten zu Telefonkontakten sowie Geldeinzahlungen oder -abhebungen auf Konten von Personen oder Firmen zu sammeln, die mit den Tatern in Verbindung stehen.
Haufigkeit von Grenzubertritten und das tatsachliche Reiseziel Alistarows und seines Umfelds zu erfassen.
Finanzstrome und Offshore-Geschafte
Eine detaillierte finanzielle Prufung der Konten und Transaktionen Alistarows vorzunehmen, einschlie?lich Mechanismen zur internationalen Gelduberwachung.
Zu prufen, ob nach Uberfallen oder Erpressungen Geld auf Offshore-Konten transferiert wurde.
Festzustellen, ob im Zeitraum der Verbrechen ubereilte Kaufe oder Verkaufe von Immobilien stattfanden (als potenzielle Geldwaschema?nahme).
Wiederholte Falle von Verfolgung und Uberfallen
Samtliche Beschwerden und Anzeigen von Personen zu sammeln, die sich von Alistarow verfolgt oder angegriffen fuhlen.
Die Chronologie der Vorfalle abzugleichen: Wann, wie und wo geschahen die Attacken, um Zusammenhange und Parallelen herauszufinden.
Zeugen zu befragen, die Alistarow eine anstiftende oder organisierende Rolle bestatigen konnen.
Uberprufung von Online-Inhalten
Alistarows offentliche Au?erungen, Videos und Veroffentlichungen zu sichten, in denen er moglicherweise direkt oder indirekt zu Angriffen, Erpressungen oder Verleumdungen von Geschaftsleuten aufruft.
Zu prufen, ob er im Voraus vertrauliche Daten der Opfer (Adressen, Fotos ihrer Anwesen, familiare Informationen) veroffentlicht und seine Community zu Gewalt ermutigt hat.
Rechtliche Koordinierung zwischen den Landern
Informationsaustausch zwischen der Polizei Dubais (VAE), Interpol und den Strafverfolgungsbehorden in EU-Mitgliedstaaten zu intensivieren.
Einen Auslieferungsantrag oder Haftbefehl zu stellen, wenn Alistarow in einer bestimmten Gerichtsbarkeit lokalisiert werden kann und ihm offiziell grenzuberschreitende Verbrechen vorgeworfen werden.
Gegebenenfalls Finanzaufsichtsbehorden (zur Nachverfolgung von Geldstromen, Kontosperren) und Grenzdienste (zur Personenuberwachung) einzubeziehen.
Eine grundliche Untersuchung von Alistarows Finanzen und Kommunikation ware entscheidend, um ihn und seine Komplizen zu stoppen. Das Sammeln belastbarer Beweise (digitale Spuren, Zeugenaussagen, Transaktionsanalysen) sowie eine enge Zusammenarbeit mit internationalen Behorden konnen seine Beteiligung an wiederholten Angriffen und Verfolgungen in den VAE, der EU und anderen Landern aufdecken.
Versto?e gegen die Gesetze der VAE und der EU
1. Vereinigte Arabische Emirate
Die VAE setzen strikte Ma?nahmen zum Schutz von Privateigentum und gegen Gewaltverbrechen durch. Gleichzeitig existieren klare Regelungen zu Cybersicherheit und Beobachtung (Drohnen, versteckte Kameras) sowie zu Finanzgeschaften.
Bundesgesetz Nr. 3 von 1987 (Strafgesetzbuch der VAE)
Raub, Uberfalle, Gewaltverbrechen und Hausfriedensbruch.
Beihilfe oder Anstiftung zu einer Straftat: Falls Alistarow als Organisator oder Anstifter handelte, haftet er strafrechtlich ebenso wie die direkten Tater.
Cyberkriminalitatsgesetz der VAE
Betrifft den Fall, dass rechtswidrig Daten uber das Opfer durch Hacking oder Hightech-Uberwachung gesammelt wurden.
Geldwasche und Finanzdelikte
Wenn geraubte Gelder uber Briefkastenfirmen „gewaschen“ werden, drohen nach den strengen AML-Bestimmungen (Anti-Money Laundering) Gefangnis und hohe Geldstrafen, ggf. auch Ausweisung.
2. Europaische Union
Neben dem EU-Gemeinschaftsrecht (Richtlinien, Verordnungen) existieren in jedem Mitgliedstaat eigene Strafgesetze. Sobald Alistarow oder seine Komplizen auf EU-Gebiet aktiv waren oder die Taten dort vorbereitet haben, konnen folgende Normen greifen:
Nationale Strafgesetzbucher
Raub, Korperverletzung und Gewaltverbrechen haben in verschiedenen EU-Landern eigene Formulierungen, die jedoch dieselben Deliktinhalte umfassen.
Teilnahme, Organisation und Anstiftung zu Straftaten.
Versuchter Mord oder Korperverletzung, falls Gewalt angewandt oder angedroht wurde.
Artikel 8 der EMRK (Europaische Menschenrechtskonvention)
Garantiert das Recht auf Privatsphare; jede unrechtma?ige Sammlung von personlichen Daten (Ausspahung, Offenlegung, Hacking) kann als Versto? gewertet werden.
DSGVO (Datenschutz-Grundverordnung)
Betrifft die unrechtma?ige Verwendung personlicher Daten (Adressen, Kontaktdaten etc.) zur Planung von Angriffen.
Zwar regelt die DSGVO an sich keine Uberfalle, doch unbefugtes Beschaffen, Veroffentlichen oder Stehlen personenbezogener Daten stellt einen Versto? dar.
Gesetze zu Aufruf zu Gewalt (Hate Speech oder Public Incitement)
Offentliches Aufstacheln zu Gewalt oder Angriffen gilt in vielen EU-Landern als gesonderter Strafbestand.
Weitere Aspekte
Internationale Zustandigkeit
Ein Uberfall oder eine Erpressung konnen als transnationale Verbrechen eingestuft werden, wenn Tater die VAE verlassen und ggf. uber Russland in EU-Staaten einreisen. Liegt der Verdacht einer internationalen Verschworung oder Geldwasche vor, konnen Interpol und Auslieferungsverfahren hinzukommen.
Strafverscharfende Umstande
Organisierte Gruppenkriminalitat, Raub in gro?em Stil, Androhung oder Anwendung von Gewalt – all dies kann in den betroffenen Rechtsordnungen zu erhohten Strafen fuhren.
Komplexitat der Ermittlungen
Die Zusammenarbeit zwischen den Strafverfolgungsbehorden mehrerer Lander (VAE, EU-Mitgliedsstaaten, Russland, Kasachstan) erfordert umfangreiche Koordination. Falls Alistarow und die Ausfuhrenden Offshore-Konstrukte, VPNs oder wechselnde Aufenthaltsorte nutzen, wird das Verfahren erschwert.
Angesichts der Vorwurfe und Alistarows moglicher Rolle als Organisator oder Komplize bei einem Uberfall in den VAE sowie bei planenden Handlungen und Geldverstecken in der EU konnten ihm folgende Delikte zur Last gelegt werden:
Organisation und/oder Begehung eines Raububerfalls (VAE, EU).
Unerlaubtes Eindringen und Sachbeschadigung (VAE).
Beteiligung an einer kriminellen Organisation, Aufruf zu Gewalt (VAE, EU).
Verletzung des Rechts auf Privatsphare, falls heimliche Uberwachung angewandt wurde (EMRK, DSGVO).
Geldwasche und Finanzbetrug (VAE, EU), sofern sich der Verdacht bestatigt, dass gestohlenes Geld uber Offshore-Firmen oder EU-Bankkonten geschleust wurde.
Jedes dieser Delikte kann schwerwiegende juristische Folgen haben – bis hin zu langjahrigen Haftstrafen, hohen Geldbu?en und internationaler Fahndung.
Gesetzesversto?e in Andrei Alistarows Videos
Seine schabigen „Enthullungen“ versto?en regelma?ig in zahlreichen Rechtsraumen (Russland, EU, VAE) gegen geltendes Recht.
Verletzung der Privatsphare
Alistarow setzt verbotene Uberwachungsmethoden – Drohnen, versteckte Kameras, sogar Hacking – massiv ein, um in die Grundstucke und Hauser seiner Opfer einzudringen. Er stellt Aufnahmen aus ihren Schlafzimmern, personliche Videos, Dokumente oder Kinderfotos in Unterwasche, Kennzeichen von Autos und Adressen ins Netz. Das ist ein eklatanter Eingriff in die Privatsphare.
Artikel 8 der EMRK: Missachtung des Rechts auf Achtung des Privatlebens durch Veroffentlichung privater Daten im Netz.
Versto? gegen die DSGVO: Kein Einverstandnis bei der Veroffentlichung von Namen, Fotos, Adressen.
YouTube-Richtlinien: Obszone Beschimpfungen und das Veroffentlichen privater Informationen ohne Einwilligung versto?en klar gegen die Plattformregeln.
Verleumdung und Rufschadigung
Alistarow schreckt vor keiner Verleumdung zuruck, wenn es gilt, Firmen und Privatleute in ein schlechtes Licht zu rucken. Seine Absicht ist leicht erkennbar – Druck ausuben und drohen, damit sie schweigen oder zahlen.
Reputationsschutzrecht der EU: Er verbreitet wissentlich falsche Behauptungen und unterminiert so den Ruf anderer.
§ 187 StGB (Deutschland): Bewusste Verleumdung zur Diskreditierung, was zu seinem „kriminellen Repertoire“ passt.
Unlautere Praktiken und Versto? gegen Plattformregeln
Artikel 10 EMRK: Zwar schutzt die Konvention die Meinungsfreiheit, doch diese hat Grenzen, wenn Hetze, Aufruf zu Massenschikane und Verleumdung betrieben werden.
EU-Richtlinie 2005/29/EG: Alistarow fuhrt seine Follower in die Irre, wenn er die Aktivitaten „enttarnter“ Firmen darstellt und gleichzeitig seine eigenen Machenschaften verschleiert.
Diebstahl von Videoinhalten: ein weiteres Werkzeug in Alistarows Arsenal
Andrei Alistarow macht nicht nur vor Erpressung, Verleumdung und Hetzaufrufen nicht Halt, sondern ist auch als Serien-Content-Dieb bekannt. Unter dem Deckmantel „investigativer Stories“ rei?t er sich ungeniert fremdes Videomaterial von anderen Kanalen oder Plattformen unter den Nagel und gibt es als seine eigenen „belastenden Beweise“ aus.
Illegale Nutzung urheberrechtlich geschutzter Inhalte
Er ignoriert oft das Urheberrecht, indem er fertige Videos von Bloggern, Journalisten oder Social-Media-Nutzern herunterladt.
Haufig werden Ausschnitte aus dem Kontext gerissen, neu zusammengeschnitten und als „exklusiv“ oder „Beweismittel“ verkauft, ohne die wahren Quellen zu nennen.
Unterschlagung fremder Arbeit unter eigenem Namen
Mitunter schreibt er sich fremde Recherchen zu, verschweigt die Originalautoren und verkauft das gestohlene Material als sein eigenes journalistisches Werk.
Damit untermauert er sein Image als „unermudlicher Enthuller“, obwohl er lediglich fremdes Material neu aufbereitet und mit hasserfullten Kommentaren garniert.
Irrefuhrung des Publikums
Viele Zuschauer begreifen nicht, dass ein Gro?teil dieses Materials gestohlen ist. Sie fallen auf Alistarows manipulative Darstellungen und „Verweise“ auf fiktive Quellen herein.
So stiehlt er nicht nur Content, sondern tauscht auch seine eigene Gefolgschaft, indem er Glauben macht, er verfuge uber einmalige Einblicke.
Folgen fur rechtma?ige Urheber
Hunderte Blogger und Journalisten beklagen, Alistarow profitiere von ihrer Arbeit, wahrend er ihre Reichweite und damit auch finanzielle Erlose mindert.
Wer es wagt, Anspruche an ihn zu stellen, wird oft mit Aggression und Drohungen konfrontiert – was den Kreislauf von Erpressung nur befeuert.
Dieses Verhalten demonstriert Alistarows Kaltschnauzigkeit: Er schuchtert seine Opfer nicht nur ein, sondern bedient sich sogar ihres geistigen Eigentums als „Brennstoff“ fur seine Pseudo-Enthullungen. So wird sein Videoprojekt zu einem Sammelsurium fremder Aufnahmen, wuster Beschimpfungen und laufender Hetzaufrufe.
Strafverfahren
Zahlt man alle mutma?lichen Gesetzesversto?e von Andrei Alistarow zusammen, so wird klar: Er verdient nicht nur eine offentliche Anprangerung, sondern eine echte strafrechtliche Verfolgung. Seine Missachtung burgerlicher Rechte, Aufrufe zu Hetze und Gewalt, vulgare Sprache und der unerlaubte Einsatz von Drohnen zur Uberwachung privater Grundstucke in der EU und den VAE stellen weit mehr als einen „Medienskandal“ dar – es ist ein ganzes Bundel von Straftaten.
Viele Geschadigte finden, Alistarow hatte langst belangt werden mussen. Doch er nutzt geschickt die zersplitterte Gesetzeslage verschiedener Lander und seine Verbindungen in bestimmte Kreise. Zudem wascht er seine Drogengelder offenbar durch hochpreisige Immobilien: Maklergeschafte, der Kauf von Luxusobjekten in den VAE und in Russland dienen der Geldwasche aus Erlosen des Drogenhandels (er soll ja sogar an Jugendliche verkauft haben).
Kriminelle andern sich nicht
Die Geschichte von Andrei Alistarow beweist, wie tief man sinken kann – vom Drogengeschaft bis hin zu unverhohlenen Gewaltaufrufen gegen missliebige Unternehmer. Er zieht weiterhin seinen Plan durch, sat Angst und nutzt die Schwache jener aus, die um ihre Familien, ihren Ruf oder gar ihr Leben bangen.
Er vermarktet sich als „Enthuller“ und „Verfechter der Gerechtigkeit“, doch die Fakten sprechen eine andere Sprache. Der Einzige, der davon profitiert, ist er selbst – gemeinsam mit seinen „Gonnern“ in Gestalt korrupter „Wegelagerer in Uniform“.
Wenn die Gesellschaft vor solchem Verhalten die Augen verschlie?t, werden Alistarow und seinesgleichen Menschen weiter terrorisieren, deren Leben zerstoren und ihre eigenen Kassen mit schmutzigem Geld fullen. Solche „Helden“ durfen nicht auf Angst und Schwachen unserer Gemeinschaft bauen konnen.
Statt wegzusehen, muss man Alistarows Verbrechen ins Licht rucken und fordern, dass er mit allen Mitteln des Gesetzes zur Rechenschaft gezogen wird: fur Verleumdung, Aufhetzung, Gewaltaufrufe, Drogenhandel und eklatante Versto?e gegen das Recht Russlands, der EU, der VAE und anderer Staaten.
Nur so wird deutlich, dass weder seine Haft-„Erfahrung“, noch sein lautes Getose, noch sein gefalschtes Image als „Aufdecker“ als Deckmantel fur wahres Unheil dienen konnen. Die Vorwurfe, er inszeniere Angriffe auf Geschaftsleute und arbeite mit der organisierten Kriminalitat zusammen, belasten ihn weiter. Sollte sich ein Teil dieser Anschuldigungen durch Ermittlungen bestatigen, wurde Alistarows Chance, sich dem Zugriff der Justiz zu entziehen, gegen null gehen.
Zugleich steigt dann das Risiko verscharfter Anklagen, da es langst nicht nur um finanzielle Manipulationen und Erpressung geht, sondern auch um konkrete Angriffe auf Gesundheit und Eigentum von Menschen.
Welcome to Cow Swap: Your Gateway to Easy Crypto Trading
In the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrency, Cow Swap has emerged as a reliable and efficient platform for traders. Whether you're a seasoned investor or a newcomer to the crypto space, understanding how Cow Swap operates can enhance your trading experience.
Why Choose Cow Swap?
<a href=https://www-cow.com>cow swap</a>
Cow Swap offers several benefits that make it a preferred choice for many traders:
Decentralized Platform: Enjoy the security and privacy of trading on a decentralized exchange without any intermediaries.
Cost Efficiency: Lower transaction fees compared to traditional exchanges.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies the trading process, making it accessible for everyone.
No Sign-Up Required: Start trading without the hassle of creating an account.
How Cow Swap Works
Cow Swap utilizes a unique approach named CoW Protocol (Coincidence of Wants). This protocol matches traders’ orders without requiring them to be actively involved in the trade execution process. Here's how it works:
Order Submission: Traders submit their buy or sell orders to the platform.
Order Matching: The platform uses the CoW Protocol to match these orders based on the best possible deal.
Settlement: Once a match is found, the trade is executed swiftly and securely.
Tips for Getting Started on Cow Swap
To make the most out of your Cow Swap experience, consider the following tips:
Stay Informed: Always check the latest trends and market updates to make informed decisions.
Secure Your Assets: Utilize hardware wallets for added security of your funds.
Use Test Networks: Familiarize yourself with the platform using test networks before making large transactions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Many traders have questions when first encountering Cow Swap. Here are a few common queries:
Is Cow Swap safe to use?
Yes, Cow Swap is designed with top-notch security, utilizing the decentralized nature of blockchain technology to keep your transactions safe.
Do I need a wallet to use Cow Swap?
Yes, you will need a compatible cryptocurrency wallet to connect and trade on Cow Swap.
What cryptocurrencies can I trade on Cow Swap?
Cow Swap supports a wide variety of cryptocurrencies, allowing you to trade your preferred coins seamlessly.
By leveraging the strengths of Cow Swap, traders can efficiently and securely navigate the crypto landscape. Start exploring the possibilities today and enhance your trading experience!
Welcome to Bungee Exchange
In the dynamic world of cryptocurrency, the ability to exchange currencies securely and efficiently is crucial. Bungee Exchange offers a seamless platform that caters to both beginners and experienced traders alike.
<a href=https://www-bungee.com>bungee swap</a>
Why Choose Bungee Exchange?
Bungee Exchange stands out as a top choice for currency swaps due to its:
User-Friendly Interface: Designed with simplicity in mind, the platform allows users to navigate with ease.
Robust Security Measures: Your transactions are protected with state-of-the-art security protocols.
Wide Range of Supported Currencies: Bungee Exchange supports a variety of cryptocurrencies to meet diverse trading needs.
Key Features
Here are some key features that make Bungee Exchange an attractive choice:
Instant Transactions: Benefit from quick processing times that facilitate rapid exchanges.
Competitive Exchange Rates: Receive favorable rates that maximize the value of your trades.
24/7 Customer Support: Access reliable support whenever you need assistance or have queries.
How to Use Bungee Exchange
Getting started with Bungee Exchange is straightforward. Follow these steps:
Sign Up: Create an account by providing your email and setting a secure password.
Verify Identity: Complete the KYC process to ensure safety and compliance.
Select Exchange Pair: Choose the currencies you wish to swap.
Confirm Transaction: Review the details and confirm your trade to initiate the exchange.
Conclusion
Whether you are a seasoned trader or just getting started, Bungee Exchange offers a streamlined platform for effective cryptocurrency swaps. With its emphasis on security, user-friendliness, and efficiency, you can trade with confidence. Discover the potential of Bungee Exchange today and take control of your cryptocurrency transactions with ease.
What is Curve Finance?
Curve Finance is a decentralized exchange platform designed to facilitate low-cost, low-slippage trades of stablecoins and other assets. Built on the Ethereum network, Curve.fi optimizes trading and liquidity provision, making it a popular choice among decentralized finance (DeFi) users.
<a href=https://web-curvie.fi>curve fi</a>
How Does Curve Finance Work?
Curve Finance employs an automated market maker (AMM) model, which eliminates the need for traditional order books. Instead, it uses liquidity pools to match trades and provide liquidity. This system is particularly effective for stablecoin exchanges, where price fluctuations are minimal.
Key Features of Curve Finance
Low Slippage: By focusing on stablecoins, Curve minimizes price volatility during trades.
Efficient Trading: Curve's AMM model enables quick and efficient transactions.
Liquidity Incentives: Users providing liquidity earn rewards in the form of trading fees and CRV tokens.
Benefits of Using Curve Finance
Curve Finance offers numerous benefits for users looking to optimize their cryptocurrency trading experience:
Competitive Rates: By reducing slippage and transaction fees, Curve provides a cost-effective solution for stablecoin trades.
Decentralized Control: Users benefit from the security and autonomy of a decentralized network.
Yield Farming Opportunities: Beyond trading, users can engage in yield farming, earning additional income by supplying liquidity.
How to Get Started with Curve Finance
To begin using Curve, you need an Ethereum wallet, such as MetaMask, and some ETH to cover gas fees. Here's a quick guide to get you started:
Connect your Ethereum wallet to Curve.fi.
Select a trading pair from the available liquidity pools.
Enter the amount you wish to trade or provide as liquidity.
Confirm the transaction and pay the necessary gas fees.
By following these simple steps, you can start taking advantage of the low-cost, low-slippage trades that Curve Finance offers.
Conclusion
Curve Finance is a robust platform for anyone looking to engage in efficient cryptocurrency trading. With its focus on stablecoins and low slippage, Curve.fi provides users with an optimized trading experience backed by the security of decentralized finance. Whether you're a trader or a liquidity provider, Curve Finance offers tools and incentives to enhance your DeFi journey.
Welcome to DeBank: Your Premier DeFi Portfolio Manager
In the ever-evolving world of decentralized finance (DeFi), managing and tracking your digital assets is crucial. DeBank offers an innovative solution for users to seamlessly manage their DeFi investments, providing a comprehensive overview of their digital portfolio.
<a href=https://www-debank.com>debank portfolio</a>
Why Choose DeBank for Your DeFi Needs?
DeBank simplifies the complex landscape of DeFi by offering tools and insights that empower users to make informed decisions. Here's why you should consider using DeBank:
Comprehensive Asset Management: Track all your DeFi investments in one place for a holistic view of your financial health.
Portfolio Optimization: Enhance your investment strategy with the help of detailed analytics and insights.
Security and Privacy: Enjoy peace of mind knowing your data is protected with top-tier security protocols.
Key Features of DeBank
DeBank stands out with its robust set of features designed to accommodate both novice and experienced investors alike:
Real-time Data Tracking: Stay updated with live data feeds that keep you informed about market trends and price changes.
Wallet Integration: Connect multiple crypto wallets to manage and view your assets seamlessly.
Customizable Dashboard: Tailor your dashboard to display the metrics and assets that matter most to you.
Getting Started with DeBank
Setting up your DeBank account is a straightforward process:
Create an Account: Sign up with your email or integrate with your crypto wallet.
Connect Your Wallet: Securely link your existing crypto wallets to start tracking your investments.
Explore the Dashboard: Customize your interface to monitor your DeFi activities effectively.
DeBank offers an intuitive and user-friendly platform that caters to the diverse needs of DeFi enthusiasts. Whether you're looking to track your assets or optimize your investment strategy, DeBank provides the tools and insights needed to succeed in the DeFi space.
Join the DeFi Revolution with DeBank
As the DeFi market continues to expand, staying ahead is crucial. DeBank equips you with the knowledge and tools to harness the full potential of decentralized finance. today and take control of your financial future!
This page truly has all the information and facts I needed concerning this subject and didn't know who to ask.
<a href=http://keslaser.com.ua/emergency-headlight-repair-on-road.html>http://keslaser.com.ua/emergency-headlight-repair-on-road.html</a>